A mainly woody fragrance, with dominant notes of cedar...maybe a hint of rose (floral notes) and pepper. It is a nice and light fragrance. Could imagine someone wearing it as office-scent or on a daily basis. If you like woody scents, you should try this one.
God! This is uninspiring, and while I would normally write a fairly neutral review which said it was okay, today I'm actively choosing to dislike this one. The reason being I'm quite partial to the original Jag fragrance and I like the brand, it's a British institution. Not going to talk about notes or performance because I'm boring myself already... Although I will say this...It's not a tea fragrance (of any note) it does open quite nicely. Soon it descends into a synthetic muskiness, mixed with an aquatic seasideyness (see re:Azzaro Chrome Legend) and then a bit of god awful, suncream and white floral 'freshness' (again see chrome legend) If you want something generic I'd normally say don't go for the well known stuff explore the discounted treasures like Dunhill and Jaguar but in this case, maybe don't bother.
So....fragrantica finally got to listing this one, no sorry I shouldn't be moaning they've responded pretty quickly it's only been FOUR YEARS! Anyway, I wrote a review at the time which I tried to spread via the forums, I can't remember exactly what I said but it was likely...."This smells a lot like Aventus." and it's true it does but when I first smelled it, either I'd forgotten what Aventus was like and didn't make the connection or I had some degree of nasal fatigue that day. The point is I liked it enough to purchase and it was only upon arriving home that I began to get the Creed connection. Since then we've had many reviews and people discovering this scent as an Aventus clone or alternative but in truth batches of Aventus seem to be so variable the dopplegangers evoke many different qualities from many different batches. This one I'd say is a very rich, deep and thicker incarnation of this 'genre' for want of better terms. One of the other Rumz (the one with the cheetah on) reminds me a lot of Black Afgano and this even has more of that deep leathery, woody texture, with pretty intense birch and cedar. This is not to say that 9325 isn't musky or pineapply because it has that going for it too. It's weird because although very similar and cheaper than Aventus I still own and enjoy both because it is mildly different enough to do so. For those who just want a good clone at a cheap price this is a must have. I'm definitely not one of those people who is bitter because they bought Aventus at full price and desperately defend it at all costs when people even mention clones they like better. It's all personal preference, and I enjoy this but genuinely prefer my bottle of Aventus. I can't even give a decent explanation as to why? I just prefer the smell. If If my arm was twisted I'd say this feels a bit heavier and clunkier than the Creed which can be cloying and annoying but when Applied sparingly is heavenly stuff, I'm just not as passionate about this one. So performance wise this is superb as you'd expect and 100% worth adding to your wardrobe...Simple.
I test drove one of those F Paces a few months back and was considering getting one as I was suitably impressed, unfortunately it's fragrance namesake is a little short of the mark but only a little mind you. It opens very generic, with an aquatic, somewhat 90's feel but soon shows what it's all about as that herbal Rosemary and lavender start to woody it up. It's soapy and mega clean, almost impossible to hate but hard to love or get excited about in any way. It reminded me of a few scents but thankfully one that comes through stronger as it dries down was Paco XS/Creed Himalaya but sadly not quite as nice as either of those. It has a bit of the Mr Burberry too a scent that I'm sure I'll be slated for actually enjoying on some level, there's shades of other stuff too but it's all very roll on deodorant and forgettable. It's died back considerably after 2 hours but still there and doesn't remind me of XS anymore (frankly I kinda wish I was wearing XS right now and that kinda sums this fragrance up.) I'm not mad at it and as far it goes Jaguar have another perfectly usable and still masculine fragrance here, exactly the kind of thing which appeals to the sort of no nonsense bloke who purchases a fragrance from Jaguar.
I love what CT does in makeup, even have one of her lipstick (only one because of their price, would have more items otherwise) and it's fabulous, nice formula, great colour, good staying power all in a luxe packaging. So I really wanted to like this perfume and was very interested on trying it, but a tiny voice inside my head kept popping up saying: "this might be a huge disappointment", so I didn't actively went looking for it. In the end I got the occasion when an eager salesgirl came up to me inside a House of Fraser last winter. Biggest mistake ever. I ended up with this thing on my wrist that assaulted my nose and not in a good way. It smelled cheap and conventional and took a lot of scrubbing to leave my skin. Not only that but the fragrance literally stuck to the woollen jumper and coat I was wearing for daaaaaaays so that I had to wash the jumper and air the coat to get rid of it. Not a fan. I even got a sample one day and spritzed it again to see if anything had changed, but I still dislike it. But of course it's a very personal thing and I actually thought that I remember having smelled something similar on a lot of women in the past, so I'm sure there is a market for it.
Songes... I truely understand why it has so many fans :) Such a nice white flower scent, I guess it's my personal favorite from the Annick Goutal house so far. It starts of with a mix of all white flowers - ylang ylang dominates, but you get the creamy frangipani and vanilla from the heart notes to the end and the dry down is most enjoyable. A really soft and comforting fragrance. No headaches, not overpowering, just lovely and great for warm weather too actually as it has some sort of freshness to it. Highly recommended for all tropical flower lovers out there, especially ylang-ylang! The one I tried was EDT by the way.
The notes sound pretty nice, but the scent smells so awful to me, sorry for the people who like it. I didn't even spray it on me! My sister was testing this today and I just smell it everywhere... even when she was not around me, it still was with me all the time. This scent gives me nausea and headaches. It feels so unnatural to me, and has this masculine touch...maybe the chestnut or the combination of notes that do not work with my chemistry. Really not my cup of tea. Just be careful with your dosage, it appears to last a lifetime :S
A lot of ylang-ylang and jasmine, very strong and no coconut to find... I was hoping for a bit more light, creamy and easygoing fragrance for summer, but this is not for me. I would recommend trying before blind buying this.
This is just a masterpiece by Bissoumine! BTW I think the brand is kinda underrated, at least for me Bissoumine scents smell very natural and are not as overpowering as other niche or designer brands, but they still last all day long. Exactly what I have been looking for. Nuit des Iles is a nearly one to one adaption of the white and yellow type of frangipani you can find nearly everywhere on the east coast of Australia. You can notice a bit of citrus and vanilla too, which gives it a comfy feeling. This sweet, flowery creamy scent brings back wonderful memories, and it's so easy to wear. If you love plumeria/frangipani you should try.
So I finally got my nose on this and I had to blind buy to do so. This was reasonably confident due to my prior knowledge and high expectation of Scent Story fragrances. Oh boy I wasn't disappointed! Elixir delivered the same same wow factor I experienced with the original 24 Gold and even the Oud edition. (The OA admittedly to a lesser extent.) So this is brilliant then? Well...not really, and for one simple reason the honey note is very strong and very accurate. For honey fans then this is comes highly recommended but that isn't what 24 Elixir is all about by a long way. The opening is a complex blend of sweet spices cinnamon and even a hint of fruit but it's mainly a dense oriental comprised of deep, resinous, amber woods and a touch of vanilla. This part of the fragrance is hats off amazing but the honey note is there to provide an icky, borderline unpleasantness to something which is otherwise sweet and rich. Don't get it twisted, I think it actually works very well and needs that extra dimension because if it was all fun and games, 24 Elixir wouldn't be half as memorable and probably too safe. There's obvious comparisons in my mind to the recent release from CdG Floriental, then there'e a pinch of Parfum de Marly Oajan and a considerable amount more of Back to Black from By Killian. So the resulting offspring of a three-way between these is not far off what you get. The performance is good as you'd expect but goes on very strong and projecting madly then fades considerably. This coincides with the fading of the strong honey note and what you're left with underneath in the drydown, is all the good stuff associated with honey and non of the bad. Not to mention the resins and woody goodness in the base of this scent, I found the drydown very enjoyable. I can't give this too much praise for simple taste reasons and my aversion to honey in this quantity. However, this is a largely successful exercise for Scent story showing that they continue to innovate and hit, huge, stunning orientals out of the park every time.
So I bought this on the spot and I often worry about such extravagant, impulse purchases because I usually regret them, if not entirely then in certainly in a minor way. I must say Iris Nazarena has held up well, it's two weeks later and I still love this fragrance. The opening was a real eyeopener for me, a soft, creamy, powdery leather and not unfamiliar from many fragrances I would've perhaps dubbed 'a bit feminine' in the past. It's brilliant though. The Iris is obvious in the opening and throughout but what struck me was just how real and buttery the leather smell is in here. It's not rough or aged this is brand new, modern, Italian, white leather. It's also woody in the extreme from the getgo. I mean there's an unmistakable quality sandalwood in this fragrance that perfectly compliments and accents the Iris and leather. I'd say there's trace hints of spice and that comes over more in the deep satisfying drydown. The one critisim of this scent could be that it's not all that strong or long lasting. I would argue that it smells so good I can forgive it these minor issues and I put plenty on, so it easily lasts all day and sticks to clothing very effectively. It's an intimate scent which doesn't need to announce itself or project wildly so that didn't bother me either. Like I mentioned, It's not totally unique or like nothing I've smelled before, I mean loads of iris scents spring to mind but few deliver the sandalwood and leather in such abundance and balance. It's a bit like Dior Homme/Homme parfum, Zegna's Florentine Iris, YSL's Noble leather, Ann Gerard Cuir d' Nacre and any quality sandalwood fragrance you'd care to insert here. The point is Aedes de Venustas Iris Nazarena is a perfect storm of all of these, arriving on my radar at a perfect time and therefore getting fast tracked into my wardrobe. I don't know why this elegant scent spoke to me so much... but it did. This fragrance is an absolute winner. Oh before I go! Just briefly on the bottle design. I tutted and rolled my eyes at the SA who couldn't wait to show me AdV and the fancy stopper mechanism but actually it was only upon getting it home and handling the bottle for myself that I actually think it's a cool design.
For anyone who missed out on these, I'm elated to tell you that most (if not the entire line?) are coming back, with new packaging. This one is especially sort after because it's gorgeous but I also really enjoyed some of the others including the rhubarb and ginger of Signature by Bertrand Duchaufour. A rare treat and recontinuation for fragrance fans.
Some people might think that Amouage have gone off the boil, non moreso than me as I've been vaguely critical of their last couple of releases but I still believe in the creative direction of the brand. I'd go as far as to say that Bracken is an effort to further diversify and broaden their range away from the super complexity and incense laden compositions they became famous for. I don't think there's anything wrong with covering the fougere base and I think this perfume does a really good job of evoking ferns and woodland greenery. Bracken is gently masculine and grown up composition which opens with clean citruses and hints of spice from cloves and cinnamon and I got quite a bit of lavender. Then giving way to an awesome combination of earthy patchouli, cedar and cypress. It hints all the main criteria for a classic fougere fragrance and I for one can dig it. I need to try it again properly to determine whether it is worth the money and has the lasting power compared to cheaper alternatives. Speaking of those it does bare more than a passing resemblance to Fougere Royale but definitely stronger and more brash. I like Bracken very much but depending on expectations some might see this one as a filler release from Amouage.
Okay so I agree with the comparisons to the obvious it's like one of those sweet, raspberry leather concoctions in the shape of the usual suspects. However, Nejma just about has it's own thing going on and especially in the opening. I can believe there's oud, rose even saffron in here because it comes across slightly smokier with an all together darker tone and less of a blatant clone of...you know what. I can tell you now that side by side they develop ever so differently but ultimately to the same end. Well I'd actually say it shares more with Clive Christian C than anything else, the leather seems a it more genuine and it's not quite as intrusive but also means that it's not quite as strong either. Apparently according to some this is reasonably priced and could be a viable option if you love this kind of scent. I think because I've smelled so many of these, I can detect subtle nuances in the way they come over but frankly once you've tested these and decided which one works for you budget wise and longvity/silage it's really not something you need to own a load of and for that reason, although lovely smelling Nejma 1 is a bit redundant. I've avoided mentioning it so far but on balance you might as well get Tuscan leather. It's not the best value but in truth it's slightly louder and longer lasting.
Rhubarb is quite possibly one of my favourite things and I've been suckered in my rhubarb scents before from the likes of CdG and the last one I purchased from Hermes. However, I was never really convinced by the accuracy of these and frankly I didn't care all that much because an augmented apple/grapefruit note or a rhubarb and custard sweet is just as enjoyable as something authentic, orgainc and accurate. Aedes de Venustas makes the above mentioned seem like Clinique Happy compared to the smell of a ripely cut orange. It's probably very much down to the vegetal, tomato leaf surround and the green vetiver an slight hint of effervescent, zing from a touch of frankincense which gives the rhubarb more credibility and it's quite a long lasting top note too. Although not massively complex there's enough going on in this scent to keep me very interested throughout and it dries down to a calming vetiver and perceivable floral notes. (must be the honeysuckle) My favourite aspect though is ginger. Not listed in the notes I hear you cry?!?! Well I get the classic culinary combination of Rhubarb and ginger in here. It could be the other elements like vetiver creating that effect but it's definitely there, and wonderful it is too. The quality is evident in this scent and although it's not massive in lasting power or silage it was okay, mellow but passable. I liked it. Not quite enough to buy but I admire it.
Anyone who reads my reviews will be aware that I'm a massive fan of Comme des Garcons but I have been a little out of the loop fragrance wise recently, so this release had passed me by somewhat. I've acquired some samples now and I've got to say on measure I don't think it's very good. The opening is fantastic and has all the excitement I'd expect, not only from CdG but from a pepper focused scent. I love the idea of black pepper being the central attraction of a scent and really like Marc Jacobs Bang and Clive Christian V for example. Unfortunately my main gripe with this fragrance is that it suffers from the same lack luster performance and intensity issues as Bang does. Blackpepper opens well enough with an unmistakable and aromatic pepper note which is both sweet, hot, dry and then into a steaky, gourmand peppercorn sauce sort of vibe. What interests me is 'where does this scent go from here?' that is the question, knowing that pepper notes are fleeting in most other outings. This one actually goes into nice CdG territory and becomes oddly sweet, reminding me of something I can't quite place. It's complex and more like a pink pepper after 20 mins or so but with some elements and style from Amazingreen or Man 2 and that incense modernity which is always a theme CdG nod to in most of their creations. The tonka is hinted at and patchouli works well with the pepper promoting an earthy but almost creamy vibe. All this complexity does please and intrigue and I'm never one to be unfair to a fragrance about lack of performance but this one on my skin was a joke. I wish I could tell you what it was like after the first hour but the fact is Blackpepper had all but disappeared. I wanted to love it so much and it does have some merit, all comme des Garcon scents please you right out of the gate but then after a few wears in hindsight, become one trick ponies. This ran the whole series of emotions in double quick time and now I'm at the last stage 'acceptance' of the fact this just isn't that great. I will wear the rest of my samples and maybe even do a revision of this review, perhaps it was my high expectations but there you go.
So I started with what I figured was the signature scent from Jeroboam and what I got was pretty standard and in my opinion, more masculine focused stuff. Opens with juniper and lemon, before settling into a potent cedar groove, both sharp with synthetic muskiness and citrus with a hint of that nutmeg but generally a woody fresh scent. I liked it, Origino is modern and more suited to a man, but I didn't love it. I thought it lasted quite well too but quiet in terms of projection. I've no idea what Jeroboam scents cost but they look expensive and judging by this they are off to a lukewarm start with me.
I fail to see how this is much of new direction for Joop Homme? It smells pretty similar to the original to me, and could be more accurately described as a tweaked, substandard version of a fragrance which is many folk don't like anyway. I'm not totally against Joop, I used to like it years ago and I don't find the new formulations to be anywhere near as potent. (dunno whether that's a good or bad thing?) Perhaps my tastes have become more refined but I find Joop Homme a messy construction. Red King is too. Really powdered feel to this with the cinnamon and perhaps pimento to liven it up in the opening. Strangely I find it cold and bit flat, probably not what they were going for. Make no mistake I'm not apposed to a chemical soup of this nature, the likes of Davidoff Hot Water for example which has a time and place for me. However this doesn't make me think, 'oh Wow! (no pun intended regarding Joop's other new release) this fragrance has rebooted and revitalized the Homme line.' Again I think this was the intention more than likely. It's definitely different from the original when it dries down there is more of a lighter feel which probably comes from the floral, orange blossom. I'm not sure this works? I've only tried it once mind so another wear and an update to this review is on the cards but I can't see how it's going to suddenly become an inspired scent.
Joop wow! Despite the ridiculous name which I can live with, and the orange box and uninspiring design, which again I actually think is striking in its own way. I can even live with the 'have to have' gimmick of the cap being like a polo mint, something I admit is a first on me...what I couldn't live with is if this scent is awful. To tell you the truth Wow! Is not awful. It's kinda got shades of a rubbery spicebomb or a less classy Gucci PHII you know that kind of sweet spicing and direction. It opens much more sweet and pungent with a bubblegum and synthetic berry accord though before it settles to that more familiar Spicebomb territory. The point is here that Wow! is not Spicebomb and I can get how it might be heavier in cardamom but the individual notes are a bit lost in this messy composition. Basically wow has all the crass DNA you'd expect from a Joop fragrance and (although I don't currently own any) I really do say that from a place of love....just. I desperately want to like some of the pour homme flankers that have graced our shelves in recent years but they all have the same balls out disregard for subtlety and nuance. Hey some people want that and Joop certainly provide it, in spades. As you enter into this really settling down, I thought it was a bit of a weakling but it's gently projecting and do you know what? I don't hate it. It's clumsy and troublesome but by no means awful if you don't mind a sweet, slightly icky, spiced fragrance then it's worth a sniff. The silage was quite good at first as I kept getting unexpected wafts but the general strength and longevity is nothing notable. I'm not wowed by wow!
My take on this fragrance having tried it a few years back and firmly put it on the back burner as an uninspiring citrus are well...Lalique White wishes it was this! No... in fairness that's a decent parallel to draw it is a musky, metallic citrus with more than a hint of pepper but it's no where near as spicy as the Lalique, has far more enduring citrus and an interesting warm base that goes on and on long after Lalique White is a distant memory. I get the stripped back modernness that could evoke an Aventus or Sauvage and personally I think it has the metallic and musky edge of something like Silver mountain water, (other citrus Creeds)or to a lesser extent Caron L'anarchiste. It's definitely got a wearable down to earth feel and is much better quality than most designer fare following a similar blueprint. It lasts really well and actually projects better than you might imagine. If it was heavily reduced in price I'd pick up a bottle for a go to sunmmer time scent. Galloway is a nice scent.
I can't believe I bought this fragrance from Fortnum & Mason about three years ago and I still haven't posted a review...I'm getting so lax these days. Anyway...I think that amount of time and several winters (coz it's a winter thing really) of wear makes me more than qualified to give my opinion and it's that Oajan is a strong outing from this house. Although I'm relatively easy to please, there's few fragrances which I'd say I'm pretty much always in love with. Oajan very nearly has that honour but because of it's inherent, festive seasonality it needs to be rested from time to time but when revisited the love affair begins anew. Yeah it's a big, warm cinnamon, booze and honey fragrance with a deep woody resinous base...adorable. Apparently it's a copycat of some Hermes fragrance and You might think this genre is over subscribed but the balance and quality of Oajan make it stand out and shine to me. It's great, the bottle looks great too it's very heavy and the cap makes a satisfying chunky "click"...(relish the little things.) Oh and the performance and silage are good too.
Gucci guilty absolute I nearly didn't bother trying this by default such is the apathy and cynicism I feel for the Gucci Guilty line and by extension Gucci perfumes of the last few years in general. I'm so glad I didn't give in to my gut because... how wrong it was. Gucci guilty Absolute is a triumph and a sign that Gucci are back on form with something truly pushing the boundaries of designer fragrance and not just some generic crap. The opening is pure bandages and antiseptic becoming an ultra dry benzoin type accord, a very dusty, ancient, precious amber type thing. It's more than that though, it's leathery in a truly authentic way but with all the oddity of resins and a smokey earthy patchouli and vetiver. (I do get EN comparisons here) It would more than likely be too strange if not for a lightly fruity note and a touch of sweetness which develops but quickly recedes, drying down to pure leather and an almost soil like patchouli in the drydown. Im shocked at how brilliant this perfume is, because it's all the weirdness of an Indy scent but is somehow wearable enough to appeal to my girlfriend, and that really is praise indeed. The woods in this are exotic and some of the driest I've encountered in designer perfumery. Scratchy vetiver and spiced hard sandalwood minus the creaminess you often get. Although Alberto Morillias is a brilliant guy responsible for some legendary fragrances but I try to never have expectations of a perfumer, especially when they have such a diverse portfolio. In this case though he has created a true gem. Many people enjoyed Gucci pour homme I and its unflinching, spicy, masculinity I think this might signal a return to that sort of thinking in a small way. I could be wrong and it's just a fluke but super enjoyable fluke with pretty decent performance and one I will definitely be adding to my wardrobe. Update: So yeah I bought it on m way home from work last night. I'm not going to be too lavish in it's praise but I stick to what I said above, this is a very strong outing from Gucci. I know what the opening reminds me of and it's the smell of the green liquid my friend uses on customers in his tattoo shop (he calls it "green soap") it's quite astringent and although the Gucci fragrance turns to earthier textures of patchouli and eventually leather, it definitely shares similarities in the beginning. I don't know what it is about me and patchouli? I always used to hate (mainly womens) perfumes that were heavy in patchouli thinking to myself 'why on earth would she want to smell like soil?' but I go through fazes of craving the stuff. Not just the chunky, velvety, chocolate type but the full on hippy variety too and I think this is where Guilty Absolute strikes up a really great happy medium.
I'll likely get slated for giving another CC fragrance, yet another glowing review but it deserves it. Well....'glowing' might be taking it a bit far because taste wise, this is not really my thing. However, in terms of complexity, creativity and sheer quality, I have to doff my cap to Rock rose. If I'm not very much mistaken the resin Labdanum comes from a plant called the rock rose? Well it would appear that there's a type of rose call the rock rose, because the labdanum one doesn't resemble a conventional rose? Anyway I digress, if you're expecting a resin bomb then you'll be out of luck because this is a fresh uplifting scent on the surface but with something slightly more sinister lurking beneath. The opening is very bright with airy citruses and musk but with a very clean and cold feel added to by the breathy, minty vibe. It immediately strikes me as more in the Lyric Man genre of rose fragrance and as it dries down you get a little more dirt from the clary sage and a more floral feel of neroli. It's strange because although very long lasting on my skin it evolved very differently to how it did on the card and sprayed and put in a bag while shopping. Smelling it now I do get much more of a luxurious base from it and yet more confusion of something resembling a deep leathery and resinous feel, but still with all the top notes there, even the mint. I have to say this revelation was far more remarkable than if I'd just worn the fragrance because I didn't notice just what a complex creature Clive Christian Rock rose was. My girlfriend absolutely adored it from the first whiff and she wore it on the same day as me. Frankly if it was hint to get it for valentines day, she can keep wanting for this price. CC fragrances seem to be constantly rising in price, the one I bought a few years ago seems pretty reasonable compared to the hike I've seen since. Anyway...creatively this is a winner for me and something which has to explored and worn several times or you might mistake for something more linear. Great but not exceptional.
I can't help thinking this is Jo Malone's answer to Fevé deliciouese but when I actually got my nose it I realised it isn't a Tonka bean classic. It opens with promise of depth and that almondy, vanilla goodness with sharp, dense, sweet gourmand harmony. I say that but it's a slightly underwhelming opening all the same. I like tonka when it's darker and more bitter, almost coffee like hints but this leans more toward a slightly headache inducing vanilla/resinous powdery accord. Also, this is not very unisex to me an leans toward the feminine, even for a seasoned fragrance lover who will pretty much wear anything. There's not a sign of the myrrh promised as this settles, when I first sniffed the opening I commented to the SA, "huh? This is another Jo Malone, 2 note fragrance that doesn't smell especially of either note." That is pretty much the story here. The opening has something balsamic in there no doubt and it has an amber feel but as it dries down becomes more like a sandalwood and just a tonne of vanilla with some femspicing. This ceases to be a gourmand fragrance very quickly and lacks the foody, natural tones of the Dior. It's maybe the aroma chemicals used to taint this vanilla/tonka accord with something resembling 'Myrrh' but it kinda smells cheap when it's dried down. I don't hate it exactly but I'm not really enjoying it. I kinda think with more elements added and something to make it 'pop' is just sadly lacking here. The very deep dry down after 5 or 6 hours there's a transformation to a more tonka like to tonka bean and a really nice creamy amber skin scent which won me around a bit. This is cause I could smell a little more of the background which is somehow masked by a cleaner vanilla/almond accord throughout but it really wasn't enough to save this one, too little too late. Performance isn't bad and when applied heavily (like I did) it projects quite impressively for the first couple of hours, unfortunately I didn't enjoy it but undoubtedly it was there in a pungent cloud. Not a patch on resent Tonka releases but worth a sniff but completely not to my tastes. Oh and to the person who thinks this smells like Z&V This is Him I can almost get where you are coming from something about myrrh & Tonka, it does give off a sandalwood vibe. However that is where the brief similarities end and Z&V is by far superior to this in terms of smell there's no competition.
Wearing this one today and to my dismay I've not posted a review for it so here goes. To say read the top two notes and say that Mon Numero 10 is a cinnamon and incense affair would be a quick and fair summary I suppose but in no way does it justice. Simple on the surface but wear it for a few hours and the hidden depths become more apparent. There's a leathery, animalic qualities, florals with juxtapositions of clean & dirty, sweet and sour. At first I thought this was quite a modern smelling interpretation of a woody spicy scent but now I'm thinking it's much more classic in it's approach, especially in the drydown. Bertrand Duchaufour has created a balanced unisex piece in Mon Numero 10 I can't fault it. Performance and silage are not massive but perfectly acceptable and if found cheaply is an affordable gem for anyone's collection.
