रिलीज़ तिथि
इत्र निर्माता
ब्रांड
यह सिग्नेचर सुगंध है
एक खुशबू एक समय में इनमें से सिर्फ़ एक सूची में रह सकती है। दूसरी सूची चुनने पर वह उसमें चली जाती है। आपकी कस्टम सूचियाँ अलग हैं।
Video ReviewsAdd
समीक्षाएं
क्या आपने इस सुगंध को आज़माया है?
अपना अनुभव साझा करें और दूसरों को शानदार सुगंध खोजने में मदद करें
Just beautiful.
Like walking through a wet garden border where the mint grows. The mint remains prominent but subsides eventually. Just an amazing scent.
Undergrowth is by far my favourite of the three I tried. I’ll get the critique out of the way to start off, I feel the same about this as Forrest it’s not a perfume in the sense that I want a perfume to be...well...perfumey! It’s a scent Aurora, a smell, indeed evocative of undergrowth without being too witchy or madly Indy. But that might just be where it misses a trick? If I was ever to represent ‘undergrowth’ the almost literal definition to me would be a mushroom accord or note. There’s loads of materials that possess these qualities such as geosmin or Ethyl fenchol. However, the stuff I like is the cliche free delivery of common and recognisable materials but rendered in such a lovely way. The patchouli is prominent but it doesn’t have that soil trope, it’s been manipulated and softened, rounded. The opening is minty but not to the point of some toothpaste, or peppermint which would seem out of place. This is very delicately placed atop the woody, greenery of the body of undergrowth. Slightly menthol, a hint of eucalyptus, a sparingly use white camphor on that body of patchouli. So apparently there’s a lot of naturals in this and it shows, the vetiver is not overt or smokey but is probably thickening and supporting that patchouli. I say thick but it’s remarkably light this one. I’ve extracted as much perfume stuff as I can out of what is another collection of woody and green materials. Perhaps I’m being unfair and expecting too much? Not every fragrance should have a diverse spread of notes and accords, and to Rooks credit, nothing jars and everything goes together in its right place. I’m being over Critical of a fragrance I fundamentally like and enjoyed. I still wouldn’t buy it though.
A photorealistic evocation of wading through wet, knee high wild vegetation immediately after a heavy shower of rain. Wild mint is especially promiment, and there's the dank smell of earth underneath it all. The scent is a little bitter and very, very green.
This scene established, it doesn't develop so much as fade to a pleasant earthy, grassy vetiver base that has definite echoes of Terre d'Hermes. This lasts an absolute age on my skin, though vetiver generally does last an eternity on me anyway, so its longevity will very much depend upon your akin chemistry, I guess.
So a perfume of two parts: the first is very striking, the second, less so, though both are very agreeable. I just wish the originality of the opening had been carried through to the drydown.