Tom Ford is a ghostly, glacial coniferous rosewood sandalwood melange of chilly, bitter, peppery woods. It is a tiny, sinister statue of a scent in an empty room where the temperature drops suddenly, with no explanation. The perfumed version of a little gremlin that appears in a haunting tale; one that skitters in the corners of your vision when the eye is focused elsewhere and inches eerily to your pillow when you're at the knife's edge of wakefulness and dream.
I get good performance from this misnamed, creamy sandlewood scent. Indeed, for me it's a delicate but strong, slightly gourmand sandlewood, like a less obnoxious Santal 33 but with a tiny touch of cardamom. I get no oud, but I wasn't expecting any, as is the case with almost all perfumes which have "oud" in the name. It's a polite woody perfume, not unique, not worth the price, but pretty and very unisex all the same, so it does have merit. Many have mentioned Hayat here, and while it's nothing like Hayat (which is way more potent and much less sandlewoody), they do share, erm, perhaps I can say a "tone". I like Hayat, but it's much less wearable, and way more screechy and abrasive and has a strong lavender note. All in all, I don't get the love for this perfume, although it's by no means bad, but I have many other more interesting sandlewood scents I prefer to wear.
It baffles me that people complain about performance. I find this absolutely relentless, and as with many of the private blends, the charm wears off way before the perfume does. It smells remarkably similar to Orto Parisi's Stercus, a scent based on the smell of bumhole.
I have loved this fragrance since the first time smelled it in 2017. In August 2020 I finally got a 50ml bottle and it is better than I remember it. Such a timeless and original smell, it makes me feel calm. As previously said in other reviews, the longevity is not great, but it is made up for in the quality.
This review is only a draft due to only having tried this once and not reaching any firm conclusions...this is my gut reaction. Been looking forward to getting my hands on this for a while now and despite the Oud trend in the perfumary business for the past several years I've yet to find one (at least with Oud in the name) to blow me away. My hopes were high...but sadly were dashed when I tried it. I have yet to give it a fair run but I found it to be dark and harsh in the opening. No denying it's a wonderful smell, Luxurious and refined but do I want wear it on my skin...Not right now...the jury is out. I can't believe my reaction to this as a lot of Oud's are too subdued for me but this one goes a little too far. Update: Okay so my original views on this are fundamentally the same I'm not really a fan of Oud wood. As for it having a 'dark & harsh opening' I think what I meant was a sharp opening which is more accurate. Oud wood is such a straight forward name that it makes you think you're maybe going to get something of an authentic Oud experience...In my opinion, you don't! I'll give it this it's unique, strong & long lasting. So an okay fragrance that is wearable but a little grating on me after a while and I certainly don't understand all the praise it gets.